The speaker critically examined the intersection of neuroscience and psychology, asserting that while neuroscience has valid scientific contributions, especially in studying brain functions like memory and cognition, psychology remains a pseudoscience lacking reproducibility, reliable clinical entities, and scientific rigor. The speaker highlighted major flaws in neuroscience studies related to psychological disorders, including small sample sizes, poor methodology, non-replicability, and the confounding influence of co-morbidities. Ultimately, the discussion emphasized that coupling immature neuroscience with pseudoscientific psychology undermines both fields, questioning the validity of constructs like ADHD and narcissistic personality disorder. Neuroscientists …