Narcissist’s Words: Problematic, Assertoric – Not Apodictic

Overview of Narcissist Speech

  • The narcissist weaponizes language and speech to protect and enhance their grandiose self-concept, fend off shame, and recruit others as sources of narcissistic supply or intimate partners. [00:00]

Philosophical Framework: Kant and Aristotle

  • Kant’s distinction of three types of speech: apodictic, problematic, and assertoric (assertorative) is introduced, with recognition that Kant’s categories were largely borrowed from Aristotle. [01:00]
  • Assertoric speech asserts something and insists it is true but requires external verification to determine its truth value (e.g., “In Siberia, snow falls all year”). [03:30]
  • Problematic statements express something that could be true but contain no way within the statement itself to prove it true or false; they convey possibility without certainty. [05:00]
  • The difference between assertoric and problematic speech is the presence of doubt or humility in problematic statements, whereas assertoric statements insist on absolute truth. [06:30]
  • Apodictic statements or judgments must be true or false by their nature and do not require external validation (e.g., “All triangles have three sides”). They are tautological and clarify pre-existing concepts. [08:00]

Truth Value and Verification of Statements

  • Assertoric and problematic statements require external information for truth evaluation, while apodictic statements are self-evidently true or false. [10:30]
  • Apodictic statements correspond to scientific proof, while dialectic statements correspond to philosophical reasoning. [11:30]

Statements About the Future and Undecidable Propositions

  • Aristotle’s view: future-tense statements cannot have definite truth values because the future is inaccessible. Predictions about the future are either undecidable or meaningless until verified by future events. [12:00]
  • Examples of undecidable propositions include existence of God and the nature of consciousness. [14:00]
  • Statements about future singular events lack determinacy and their truth value is undecidable without actual occurrence. [14:30]

Application to Narcissist Speech

  • Narcissists claim omniscience and omnipotence, presenting future-related statements as inevitably true and unbeatable promises, contrary to Aristotle’s view on future statements. [15:30]
  • Narcissists avoid problematic speech and doubt; they exclusively use assertoric speech, insisting that their statements are definitely true without room for debate. [16:30]
  • Narcissists often engage in apodictic speech by redefining and reframing known concepts, creating an illusion of innovation or genius without adding meaningful content (e.g., proclaiming obvious truths as revolutionary insights). [17:00]
  • The hallmark of narcissist speech involves assertoric claims of absolute truth and apodictic-like presentations of old ideas as groundbreaking discoveries—typified by charismatic leaders and public figures. [18:00]

Timestamp Legend

  • [mm:ss]: Minutes and seconds indicated from the transcript where specific information was discussed.
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Skype
WhatsApp
Email

https://vakninsummaries.com/ (Full summaries of Sam Vaknin’s videos)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html (My work in psychology: Media Kit and Press Room)

Bonus Consultations with Sam Vaknin or Lidija Rangelovska (or both) http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/ctcounsel.html

http://www.youtube.com/samvaknin (Narcissists, Psychopaths, Abuse)

http://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings (World in Conflict and Transition)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com (Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/cv.html (Biography and Resume)

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

What is Sublimation? Duty and Beast

The speaker provided a clinician-focused exploration of sublimation, defining it as an ego-driven transformation of instinctual energy (originally sexual, later including aggression) into socially valued, non-instinctual activities through mechanisms like

Read More »

Sadistic Honesty or Truthtelling?

Sam Vaknin distinguishes constructive truthtelling from sadistic honesty, arguing that honesty becomes harmful when it targets others’ vulnerabilities, is performed publicly to humiliate, or is used for self-aggrandizement. He emphasizes

Read More »