How Narcissist Survives Defeats, Errors, Failures

How Narcissist Survives Defeats, Errors, Failures

Overview The speaker (S. Vaknin) outlines the central paradox of pathological narcissism: two mutually exclusive, irreconcilable narratives that create chronic dissonance and overwhelming anxiety for the narcissist. The talk explains how the narcissist oscillates between grandiosity (omniscience, omnipotence, divinity) and a persecutory victim stance (believing others conspire, envy, or seek to destroy them). This duality forces persistent externalization of regulation and the development of compensatory self-deceptions called “internal solutions.”

Key points

  • Core paradox: Narcissists hold two incompatible narratives simultaneously: (1) Godlike superiority (genius, beauty, omnipotence) and (2) victimhood (believed persecution, envy and conspiracy by others).
  • Dissonance and anxiety: The impossibility of being both omnipotent and victim creates intense anxiety, leading to pervasive attempts at self-regulation.
  • External locus of control: Narcissists experience their lives as driven by external forces (others’ envy, conspiracies, institutional discrimination), outsourcing ego-regulation and self-worth to others — i.e., seeking narcissistic supply.
  • Self-deception and internalization: To reduce terror at being dependent on others, narcissists convince themselves that external agents are actually internal objects (figments), then craft narratives that reestablish a sense of control — the “internal solution.”

The Internal Solutions (strategies to reconcile omnipotence and victimhood)

  1. Puppet-master narrative: The narcissist claims to be the cause of others’ hostile behavior — they “make” people conspire or attack because the narcissist triggers or manipulates them. This preserves omnipotence while acknowledging external hostility.
  2. Permission/consent narrative: The narcissist believes others act against them only because the narcissist allows or permits it (i.e., others have implicit or explicit permission to mistreat them), maintaining control.
  3. Creator/architect narrative: The narcissist asserts they shaped or created the environment and people’s personalities; therefore, any hostility occurs within a space the narcissist defined — preserving mastery over context.
  4. Imitation/plagiarism narrative: Hostile acts (denigration, theft, plagiarism) are reframed as attempts by others to copy or emulate the narcissist; others’ transgressions underscore the narcissist’s superiority and justify being targeted because they are reminded of their own inferiority.

Religious and mythic resonances

  • The speaker repeatedly highlights parallels between narcissistic internal solutions and religious narratives, especially Christian themes (Jesus’ foreknowledge and willing crucifixion). Narcissistic self-victimization and grandiosity mimic theological frameworks where suffering is willed or instrumental to a higher design.
  • The talk suggests narcissism functions like a personal religion — employing doctrines that reconcile paradoxes by invoking control, destiny, and sacrificial narratives.

Clinical and psychological implications

  • Narcissists lack an integrated, self-contained regulatory system and thus outsource regulation to others, making them highly dependent on external validation and prone to intense dysregulation when that supply is threatened.
  • Internal solutions are self-deceptive but functional: they mitigate terror at dependence, permit continued grandiosity, and justify maladaptive behavior.
  • These narratives enable narcissists to reinterpret persecution as proof of superiority (envy, plagiarism), maintain moral exemption, and frame victimization as self-chosen, controlled, or even meaningful.

Illustrative examples and metaphors used

  • Puppet-master metaphor: narcissist as director controlling actors who “think” they act autonomously.
  • God/theodicy analogy: comparing narcissist’s rationalizations to theological attempts to reconcile a benevolent omnipotent God with the existence of evil.
  • Supreme Court/Trump analogy: judicial approval as “permission” allowing transgressive behavior, mirroring how narcissists imagine permitting or causing others’ hostility.
  • Jesus/Crucifixion motif: the narcissist as both divine and victim, choosing or orchestrating suffering to sustain a unifying narrative.

Conclusions

  • Pathological narcissism is an “inexorable machinery” of defensive strategies designed to resolve the impossible coexistence of omnipotence and victimhood.
  • Internal solutions are elaborate, often religiously inflected narratives that restore a semblance of control, meaning, and moral coherence.
  • These strategies are deceptive yet psychologically functional: they reduce unbearable dependency, justify hostility, and maintain grandiose self-concept despite experienced setbacks or persecution.

Recommendations/Implications for further study or clinical attention

  • Clinicians should note the central role of external regulation and internal solutions in maintaining narcissistic defenses.
  • Exploring the religious and mythic content of internal solutions might help in formulation and in developing interventions that address the core paradox rather than only surface behaviors.
  • Attention to the narcissist’s use of narrative (puppet-master, permission, creator, imitation) can guide therapeutic confrontation and restructuring of delusional self-schemas.
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Skype
WhatsApp
Email

https://vakninsummaries.com/ (Full summaries of Sam Vaknin’s videos)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html (My work in psychology: Media Kit and Press Room)

Bonus Consultations with Sam Vaknin or Lidija Rangelovska (or both) http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/ctcounsel.html

http://www.youtube.com/samvaknin (Narcissists, Psychopaths, Abuse)

http://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings (World in Conflict and Transition)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com (Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/cv.html (Biography and Resume)

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

What is Sublimation? Duty and Beast

The speaker provided a clinician-focused exploration of sublimation, defining it as an ego-driven transformation of instinctual energy (originally sexual, later including aggression) into socially valued, non-instinctual activities through mechanisms like

Read More »

Sadistic Honesty or Truthtelling?

Sam Vaknin distinguishes constructive truthtelling from sadistic honesty, arguing that honesty becomes harmful when it targets others’ vulnerabilities, is performed publicly to humiliate, or is used for self-aggrandizement. He emphasizes

Read More »